PATIENT ASSESSMENT: e e - FIRST ATTEMPT LIKELY FAKE
Justification: The submission contains numerous red flags, including generic responses, nonsensical narrative, unrealistic budget range for selected treatments, and contradictory anxiety levels.
Red flags/inconsistencies:
- Generic narrative response
- Nonsensical narrative content
- Unrealistic budget range for selected treatments
- Contradictory anxiety levels
Recommendation: REJECT - Submission displays multiple red flags indicating potential spam/fake submission.

Treatment: This patient is seeking a new dentist due to high costs and is focused on improving their smile cosmetically, addressing cavities or tooth decay, and resolving gum problems or bleeding.
Budget: With a comfortable range of $3,000-$7,500 for out-of-pocket expenses, the patient plans to handle payment through dental savings plans or membership.
Preferences: They prefer a gentle, reassuring approach with step-by-step guidance from their dentist and value practitioners who are good with anxious patients.
Insurance: This patient has PPO dental insurance through Cigna and is ready to start treatment immediately, especially for emergency situations.
Timeline: The patient's last dental visit was 1-2 years ago, and they are motivated by career/professional reasons to pursue cosmetic treatments like cosmetic bonding/reshaping and replacing old dental work.
Availability: They prefer evening appointments and are willing to travel over 30 miles for the right dentist, showing geographic flexibility and no gender or language preferences.
Previous Experience: Having had deep cleaning (scaling & root planing) previously, the patient rates their dental anxiety at a moderate level (4-6) and is concerned about feeling judged about their dental condition.
Anxiety: Their gum issues are mainly related to bad breath/taste, and they appreciate a preventive approach to dental care, addressing small issues before they escalate.

N/A